| 
         | 
 
       | 
		||
        
![]() Geomorphic Assessment of Channel Systems 
Evidence of scour at bridge pilings and culverts is particularly important as an indicator of the 
amount of degradation that has occurred since the construction of the structure. 
3.1.3 CHANNEL STABILITY ASSESSMENT 
The third phase of a geomorphic assessment involves an analysis of the channel 
stability. This is accomplished by the refinement and detailed analysis of all the 
historical and archive data previously collected, interpretation of the field reconnaissance 
observations, and the integration of these data to provide an overall assessment of the system. 
3.1.3.1 Identification of Geomorphically Similar Reaches 
One of the first steps in the channel stability assessment is to divide the channel into 
geomorphically similar reaches. When establishing reach limits, consideration should be given 
to: changes in channel slope, tributary locations, presence of geologic controls, planform 
changes, location of channel control structures (grade control structures, dams, culverts, etc.), 
changes in bed material size, major sediment sources (gravel mines, sediment laden tributaries, 
etc.), changes in channel evolution type, or other significant hydrologic or geomorphic 
changes. Initial reach limits may be made early during the field investigation, but may be 
refined following more detailed analysis. 
3.1.3.2 Specific Gage Analysis 
Perhaps one of the most useful tools available to the river engineer or 
geomorphologist for assessing the historical stability of a river system is the specific gage 
record. A specific gage record is a graph of stage for a specific discharge at a particular 
gaging location plotted against time (Blench, 1969). A channel is considered to be in 
equilibrium if the specific gage record shows no consistent increasing or decreasing trends 
over time, while an increasing or decreasing trend is indicative of an aggradational or 
degradational condition, respectively. An example of a specific gage record is shown in Figure 
3.3. 
66 
 | 
			||
![]()  | 
		||