| 
         | 
 
       | 
		||
        
![]() General Approach to Bank Stabilization 
4.1.5 NON-STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS 
Two situations where a non-structural alternative may be considered are: 
Erosion due to navigation traffic in confined channels 
Bank instability caused by varying reservoir releases 
4.1.5.1 Regulation of Navigation 
Regulation of vessel size and speed to reduce erosion from boat or ship passage is a 
preferable solution and has major environmental benefits, but it may be legally or politically 
impractical, depending on the local situation. Prediction of the reduction in erosion from 
regulation is also difficult, which compounds the legal and political problem. Also, public 
perception of the cause of erosion tends to overemphasize the actual effects of vessel traffic. 
4.1.5.2 Regulation of Reservoir Releases 
This approach presents much similar benefits and problems as regulation of 
navigation. Reservoir releases are usually dictated by multiple purposes, and their impact on 
bank stability is likely to be well down the list of priorities. Also, the public perception of 
damages from reservoir operation may far exceed the actual damages. In fact, as discussed 
in Section 4.1.1.2, the net effect of reservoirs is often to improve bank stability. Two 
exceptions may exist: 
If discharge from a reservoir is frequently and rapidly reduced from close to 
bankfull to no flow or low flow, geotechnical instability may be increased 
compared to natural conditions. 
If reservoir operation increases the duration of high in-bank flows, the total 
amount of bank erosion associated with those flows will obviously increase. 
However, an increase in long-term erosion will be difficult to prove, because 
the accompanying reduction in peak flows and their associated erosion may 
more than compensate. 
4.2 CONSIDERATION OF OTHER FACTORS 
A project which performs adequately by traditional engineering standards can 
nevertheless create public dissatisfaction, because the public takes good engineering for 
granted, and sometimes focuses on the project's negative aspects. This negative focus may 
result from inadequate consideration by the project planners of factors which may be beyond 
what is traditionally considered to be included in the engineering of a project. 
9 
79 
 | 
			||
![]()  | 
		||