| 
         | 
 
       | 
		||
        
![]() Appendix B: Bioengineering for Streambank Erosion Control -- Guidelines 
engineers, hydrologists, and life scientists with expertise in bioengineering approaches. Other 
disciplines, such as economists, sociologists, and attorneys can be consulted as needed during 
the planning stage of development. 
Questions to be Developed and Answered. 
Any streambank erosion control project has several components. Each component may 
have constraints that have to be overcome. These components with associated constraints 
are interdependent and must be considered, thus generating an abundance of questions that 
should be answered, if possible. They include the political, economic, climatatological, 
physical, edaphic (soils), and biological components of the project. Both the asking and 
answering of these questions relative to these components lead to the Plan of Development. 
Once the plan is developed and permits acquired, procurement of plants will be required (See 
Part III). After or concurrent with this procurement, implementation of the plan can proceed. 
The political component includes governmental regulations, such as those presented in 
Section 404 of the The Clean Water Act (formerly known at the Federal Water Pollution 
Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 1344). It also includes public pressures, such as restricting 
bioengineering to the use of only native plant species or plants that are grown in a nursery as 
opposed to those harvested from the wild. Governmental regulations and/or public pressures 
may also mandate that certain vegetation species or types of species be used. If a certain 
species blocks the view of a river in an urban setting, for instance, public pressures may cause 
plans to change to use a different species or a different erosion control treatment altogether. 
Lack of grazing controls, limitations on use of chemicals for rodent, insect, or weed control 
or fertilizers are other examples of these constraints and must be considered in any 
bioengineering design criteria protocol. The political component also includes the negative 
human factors of vandalism and trespass by foot and off road vehicles as well as the positive 
factor of public pressure for improvement of the environment. 
The economic component could be one of the more important factors to enable 
bioengineering erosion control efforts. Usually, bioengineering projects are less expensive 
than traditional engineering approaches. However, economics invariably affects the final 
decisions on the selection of plant species and planting densities, as well as pre-project 
experimentation and after care activities. A bioengineering design protocol must include 
funding for monitoring and allow for remedial planting and management of the site to meet 
the objectives of the project. Bioengineering projects will often require more funds early in 
the project's history for possible repair and assurance of effectiveness than traditional 
engineering, but will be more self sustaining and resilient over the long term. If traditional 
engineering projects need remediation over the life of the project (and they frequently do), 
the remediation occurs later in the life of the project but with higher overall costs. 
The climatatological component includes several aspects of a project site: rainfall (amount 
and distribution), temperature (heat and cold, time, duration, and intensity), humidity, day 
length, etc. Climatatological components affect plant species selection, how those plants will 
be planted, and treatment after planting. With some exceptions, bioengineering projects in 
humid regions with ample rainfall and projects along permanent flowing streams will probably 
B-8 
 | 
			||
![]()  | 
		||