| 
         | 
 
       | 
		||
        
![]() Appendix B: Bioengineering for Streambank Erosion Control -- Guidelines 
Monitoring and Aftercare 
Most importantly, monitoring and necessary aftercare must be a part of any 
bioengineering design and must be included in the plan of development and the 
implementation stage. The intensity and frequency of monitoring and aftercare will depend 
on site conditions, such as harshness of climate, probability of animal disturbance, high wave 
or current conditions, etc., and on established success criteria. 
On many sites, it is essential to protect plantings from damage by animals, such as Canada 
geese (Branta canadensis), or beaver (Casta canadensis) and other mammals. The use of 
irrigation may be required during aftercare and will improve growth and survival of plantings 
that are installed during dry seasons and in dry soils. The decision about irrigation must be 
made based on economics contrasting the need to irrigate with the cost of possible mortality 
and the consequences of failing to obtain the desired erosion control and other functions. See 
Part IV for more detail on monitoring. 
Hard Structures and Bioengineering 
Generally speaking, bioengineering is considered "a soft fix." This is not necessarily the 
case. On first or second order streams, the sole use of vegetation with perhaps a little wire 
and a few stakes for holding the vegetation until it is established makes bioengineering more 
of a soft treatment. However, bioengineering is used also in combination with hard 
structures. These hard structures are used to protect the toe of the bank from undercutting 
and the flanks (ends of treatment) from eroding. The larger the stream or stronger the flow, 
the more probable that hard structures will be incorporated into the bioengineering design 
model. This is also true when risks become greater, such as when an expensive facility is 
being threatened. As an example, a utility tower along a stream in Georgia1 was being 
threatened by erosion. A rock revetment had previously been used in front of the tower, but 
was washed out. A bioengineering treatment that incorporated live willow whips and a log 
crib were installed to control erosion. Crib logs controlled undercutting and flanking while 
the live willow whips installed between the log stringers developed and strengthened the 
overall structure and gave it a "green" appearance. 
In most of the case studies presented in Volume II, and in the references made to other 
bioengineering streambank erosion control, hard structures such as rock riprap, log/tree 
1 
Ms. Robin Sotir, personal communication, President, Robin Sotir and Associates, 
Marietta, Georgia 
B-15 
 | 
			||
![]()  | 
		||